GRE不光有技巧,不光有快速解题法,GRE更加考察大家的逻辑硬实力,文字理解实打实的深度。良好的GRE备考应当在课堂上向老师学习快速解题法,取同取反逻辑的同时,课下扎扎实实的读懂每一句话。读懂,是一切技巧使用的前提。皮之不存,毛将焉附?
Passage 69
Historian Colin Calloway argues that in the late colonial period preceding the American Revolution (1775-1783), the British government sought to seal off territory west of the Appalachian Mountain from the encroachment of land-hungry White settlers, to negotiate with Native American peoples as independent foreign states, and to guarantee the integrity of traditional native American hunting grounds. By contrast, White Americans, released by the outbreak of the Revolution from the constraints of Britain’s allegedly benevolent policies, are portrayed by Calloway as ruthless land-grabbers whose new national government endorsed their rapacity. Bernard Bailyn argues, however, that the “Americans” who encroached on Native American land during the Revolution had been British only a few years before. When, during and after the Revolution, White Americans seized Native American land by any available means, they were continuing a tradition dating back to the earliest years of English settlement in North America. And, according to Bailyn, the British government’s prewar efforts to preserve the trans-Appalachian west for Native Americans resulted not from humanitarian virtue or ethnic tolerance but from British Merchants’ desire to maintain their lucrative trade with native Americans and the government’ s desire to control immigration and avoid costly conflict between White and Native Americans over land.
文章解析
题目解析
白话版讲解:
第一题:这篇文章的主旨大意是什么?
这道题应该选 D。这篇文章描述了 Calloway 和 Bailyn 两位学者对某个历史事件的看法。两者的看法是相对立的。
A. 表明两种有关某个特定历史时期的论证过程都是有问题的。
B. 提供了历史证据来削弱一个广泛认可的观点。
C. 为一个的修正主义历史学家的观点进行辩护,这个观点受到了传统主义者的批评。
D. 概述了对某个历史现象的两种对立的解释。
E. 平息了历史学中对某个具有争议的历史事件进行的争论。
关键字:GRE考试,GRE培训,上海GRE培训,